ZygoSwap

Economic design score 100 out of 100.
ZygoSwap demonstrates an exceptional economic design, achieving a perfect score. The project has a defined hard cap of 1,000,000,000 tokens, and impressively, 100% of the total supply is currently circulating. This transparency in supply dynamics enhances investor confidence and suggests a well-thought-out token structure.

Liquidity and market dynamics score 62 out of 100.
The liquidity and market dynamics of ZygoSwap show moderate strength with a score of 62. The trading volume relative to market capitalization is quite favorable at 42.01%, indicating active trading interest. However, the liquidity depth suggests some limitations, with a 24-hour trading volume of $840,723 and the presence of five exchanges, though one is rated negatively.

Team credibility score 25 out of 100.
ZygoSwap has significant concerns regarding team credibility, scoring only 25. The team remains anonymous, which raises questions about transparency and accountability. Additionally, there are no available audit reports or information regarding the asset's deployment or genesis date, further contributing to the overall risk associated with the project's leadership.

Social behavior score 76 out of 100.
ZygoSwap enjoys a reasonably strong social behavior score of 76. The project's Telegram channel has a substantial following of 14,479 members, and the Twitter account is verified, although its audience data is limited. The absence of negative signals, such as allegations or bad press, reflects positively on the project's overall reputation within the community.

Contract mechanics score 100 out of 100.
The smart contract mechanics of ZygoSwap are robust, earning a perfect score. The project features a verified contract, with no honeypot risks and complete open-source access. Key safety features are in place, including disabled mint authority and secure ownership privileges, as well as protections against balance manipulation and hidden functions.

Inherent risks remain in investing in ZygoSwap, particularly due to the anonymous team and lack of audits. While the project excels in economic design and smart contract safety, potential investors should approach with caution, understanding the implications of limited transparency and team accountability.