ZERA

Liquidity and market dynamics score 52 out of 100. Recent trading activity looks moderate: volume-to-market-cap is high at 4.86%, while liquidity depth is limited with $163,381 of 24h volume. Exchange presence is also mixed, with listings on 3 exchanges showing 1 green, 1 yellow, and 1 red. Overall, market access exists, but depth and venue quality are not consistently strong.

Team credibility score 82 out of 100. The asset is about 1.3 years old, and the team is publicly identified. The project’s whitepaper is rated high at 100, which supports clarity of goals and technical framing. The main gap is audit information—there is no audit data available in the provided inputs.

Social behavior score 59 out of 100. Social audience indicators show limited reach on one platform (Twitter linked, follower count unavailable) and 1,170 Telegram users, while influencer analytics are not available in the snapshot. Risk signaling is mixed: the record shows 0 allegations, but also 1 piece of bad press and 1 incidents, with 0 regulatory flags. The absence of an enrichment record limits additional corroboration.

Contract mechanics score 100 out of 100. Security-relevant functionality appears robust in the provided checks: no honeypot behavior, open source code, minting disabled, owner privileges controlled, balances locked, and buy/sell trading taxes set to 0.0%/0.0%. Hidden or pausable/blacklist features are reported at 100, and the supply has a hard cap of 999,375,033 with 100% of total supply circulating. However, there is no block explorer data available here, so verification details may be incomplete.

Inherent crypto risk note: Even with strong contract-level controls, smart-contract tokens can still face volatility, liquidity swings, and market-access risk depending on trading venues and depth. Social and market signals can change quickly, and any incident or bad press can affect sentiment even when technical safeguards are strong.