Zebec Protocol

Liquidity and market dynamics score 6 out of 100. On-chain liquidity depth is extremely thin, with just $10 of 24h volume, and the volume-to-market-cap ratio is missing. Exchange listing data shows activity on 2 exchanges, but none are “green-trust,” with 1 yellow and 1 red designation, alongside the flags very low liquidity and no green-trust exchange, which materially raises market-access and slippage risk.

Team credibility score 86 out of 100. The asset is mature at about 5.3 years old, team identity is publicly identified, and public security records show 1 audit firm on record. The whitepaper is rated high, which supports baseline transparency about the project’s goals and implementation.

Social and behavioral score 62 out of 100. Audience signals are mixed: Twitter is linked but follower analytics are limited, while Telegram shows 6,162 followers. Security-style reputation checks reflect 1 allegation and 1 item of bad press, with no regulatory flags and no incidents recorded, which keeps this bucket from scoring higher despite the presence of community channels.

Contract mechanics score 100 out of 100. Core technical protections look strong: the contract is open source with no honeypot behavior detected, minting is disabled, and mint/owner privileges appear properly constrained. Balances are locked, hidden/pausable/blacklist-style functionality checks score 100, trading tax is 0% on both buy and sell, and a hard supply cap of 10,000,000,000 is defined.

Inherent crypto risk for Zebec Protocol: even with excellent contract mechanics, the overall safety profile is pulled down by very low liquidity and limited market depth, which can make trades harder and increase volatility. Additionally, the presence of some scam-related allegations and bad press means reputational and off-chain risks can still matter, despite strong on-chain controls.