Zama

Liquidity and market dynamics score 84 out of 100. Volume-to-market-cap is high at 6.78% and liquidity depth is supported by $4,347,621 of 24h volume. Exchange listing data shows very broad availability, with 26 exchanges tracked and most entries in green or yellow status. Overall, the trading environment appears relatively robust for entering and exiting positions compared with many smaller-token markets.

Team credibility score 75 out of 100. The asset has 1.3 years of history, with 1 audit firm on record and a whitepaper rated highly. The team is publicly identified (doxxed), and the deployer address is known and recorded. Deployer credibility scores 70, suggesting meaningful information is available, though not at the very top tier for every component.

Social and behavioral risk score 59 out of 100. Social audience data indicates Telegram has 71,168 members, while Twitter and another channel are marked as linked with limited follower statistics available. Sentiment is moderately positive at 60% up and 40% down. Security analysis notes 1 allegation, 1 item of bad press, 0 regulatory flags, and 1 incident. The presence of scam-related allegations is reflected in the flag status, which keeps this bucket below the midline.

Contract mechanics score 96 out of 100. Public records show the contract is verified, open source, and has no honeypot behavior. Mint authority is disabled, ownership safety checks score 100, and balances are locked, all of which reduce common rug-pull mechanics. Trading tax is 0.0% for buys and sells. One key exception is that no hard supply cap is defined (potential inflation), and only 20% of total supply is circulating (under 50% bucket flag), even though the core controls are strong.

Holder distribution score 15 out of 100. Concentration risk is high: the top 10 wallets hold 93.8% and the top 50 wallets hold 99.0%. The largest non-filtered wallet holds 68.9%, and there is also a flag for a single wallet exceeding 10% of holdings. Even with 3,959 total holders, the distribution metrics point to limited decentralization, which can increase price impact from large holders.

Inherent crypto risk (Zama): even with strong contract controls, the asset shows meaningful distribution concentration and a flagged lack of a hard supply cap, alongside under-50% circulating supply. If large holders move funds or token supply expands over time, market dynamics can change quickly. Additionally, scam-related allegations exist in the public record, so due diligence and position sizing remain important.