Yield Basis

Liquidity and market dynamics score 87 out of 100. Trading liquidity looks strong, with volume relative to market cap reported at 40.83%. Depth is supported by 24h volume of about $9,280,647. Exchange listing data is extensive: 37 exchanges are reporting presence, with 22 labeled green, 14 labeled yellow, and 1 labeled red, which collectively suggests the token is actively traded across multiple venues.

Team credibility score 53 out of 100. The asset is about 1.3 years old, and there is 1 audit firm on record with an audit score component of 60. The whitepaper is rated high (100), and the deployer address is recorded (70). However, the team is anonymous (25), which meaningfully reduces confidence despite the other positives.

Social and behavioral risk score 64 out of 100. Public-facing signals show some audience presence: Twitter (linked) and Telegram (864) are reported, while influencer snapshot analytics are unavailable in the provided feed. On risk review, agent risk signals are strong: 0 allegations, 1 bad press, 0 regulatory items, and 0 incidents. The lack of an enrichment record limits context, but the absence of incidents is reassuring.

Contract mechanics score 98 out of 100. The core smart-contract safety indicators are very high. Contract verification is complete (100), there is no honeypot behavior (100), and the code is open source (100). Minting is disabled (100), owner privileges and balance safety checks score 100, and hidden/pausable/blacklist function checks are also rated 100. Trading tax is 0% for buys and sells, and a hard supply cap of 1,000,000,000 is defined. Balance manipulation is not indicated (100), and the circulating supply is under 50% (per the provided flag).

Holder distribution score 24 out of 100. Concentration is a key weakness. Top 10 wallets hold 89.6% of supply (and top 10 above 70% plus top 10 above 50% flags are set), while top 50 wallets hold 97.7%. The largest non-filtered wallet holds 28.9% (28). Although holder count is reported at 7,510, the concentration metrics suggest elevated dependence on a small number of wallets, which can increase volatility and counterparty concentration risk.

Even with a favorable contract safety profile, this asset still carries inherent crypto risks: token concentration among large holders can amplify price swings, and an anonymous team can increase uncertainty around updates and long-term governance. Smart-contract protections reduce specific classes of technical risk, but they don’t eliminate market, liquidity, or operational risks inherent to token ecosystems.