Whalebit

Economic design score 100 out of 100.
Whalebit's economic structure demonstrates robustness, achieving a perfect score. The project has a clearly defined hard cap of 422,375,579 tokens, suggesting a well-thought-out supply limitation that can help maintain value. This solid foundation is crucial for potential investors looking for stability in their assets.

Liquidity and market dynamics score 59 out of 100.
The liquidity and market dynamics are moderate, with the liquidity depth score standing at 76. The 24-hour trading volume of $10,757,963 indicates a reasonable level of activity. However, the project encounters challenges due to missing volume or market capitalization data, and its presence on exchanges also requires attention with a lower score of 37.

Team credibility score 53 out of 100.
Whalebit's team credibility score is somewhat concerning at 53. While the whitepaper is rated highly, and the deployer address is known, the team is anonymous, which raises trust issues. Additionally, there is only one audit firm on record, which may not provide sufficient reassurance to potential investors.

Social behavior score 81 out of 100.
The project's social engagement appears positive, evidenced by a score of 81. With a sentiment ratio of 91% positive to 9% negative, it shows strong community support. However, the audience data for its Twitter account is limited, while Telegram boasts a significant following of 51,228, potentially enhancing outreach and influence.

Contract mechanics score 99 out of 100.
Whalebit's contract mechanics are exceptionally sound, scoring 99. The contract is verified and open source, with no hidden functions or honeypots, ensuring transparency and security. Although it uses an upgradable proxy pattern, the overall governance features, including mint authority and owner privileges, are managed safely.

While the overall safety score of Whalebit is rated at 73.07, it's essential to recognize inherent risks in cryptocurrency investments, including market volatility and regulatory uncertainties. The project's anonymous team and the use of an upgradable proxy are areas of concern that potential investors should consider carefully.