TOMI

Track record score 100 out of 100.
The project has a flawless regulatory history, with no regulatory actions reported against it. Additionally, it has no historical incidents, indicating a strong foundation of reliability and compliance. This high score signifies a stable background for potential investors.

Economic design score 75 out of 100.
TOMI has sustained a good economic structure, with 100% of its total supply currently circulating. However, it lacks a defined hard supply cap, which might introduce inflation concerns in the future. Overall, this score reflects a solid design but highlights some room for improvement regarding supply management.

Developer health score 0 out of 100.
The project indicates significant developer inactivity, as evidenced by a lack of GitHub stars and forks, as well as no commits or contributors in the last month. This absence of recent development raises red flags regarding the project's ongoing enhancement and long-term viability.

Network security score 40 out of 100.
With a market cap just above $5 million, the economic security of TOMI is low, posing a risk for potential investors. While it has not experienced any historical incidents, the low economic security score suggests a greater vulnerability to market fluctuations and external threats.

Social behavioral score 73 out of 100.
TOMI's social media presence is verified with audiences on platforms such as Telegram and Twitter, although specific follower counts are currently unavailable. The project has shown no negative signals from influencers or in the press, contributing to a generally positive social perception.

Adoption liquidity score 4 out of 100.
The project's liquidity is extremely low, characterized by minimal daily trading volume of approximately $374 and lackluster market cap metrics. Additionally, it has only one exchange listing without green trust accreditation, posing challenges for market accessibility and investor confidence.

Investing in TOMI carries inherent risks due to its low adoption liquidity, minimal developer engagement, and economic vulnerabilities. Potential investors should weigh these factors carefully against the project's positive track record and some solid economic design indicators.