Tea Protocol

Track record score 82 out of 100 (A). The project has been live for about 4.4 years, which supports a meaningful operating history. Public records show 0 regulatory actions, and incident history is relatively limited, with 1 historical incident recorded and an incident-clean measure of 80. Overall, the longer presence and clean regulatory record are key positives, while the single historical incident keeps the score from being perfect.

Developer health score 0 out of 100 (F). Security analysis shows no developer activity in the last 4 weeks, with 0 GitHub stars, 0 forks, 0 commits, and 0 PR contributors. The flag "norecentcommits" indicates a lack of recent code updates. With no observable contribution signals and no recent commits, this bucket is the weakest area in the safety score.

Network security score 72 out of 100 (BBB). On-chain data indicates a 4.4-year chain age and a defined hard cap of 100,000,000,000. Economic security is limited by missing market cap information, but supply controls appear strong, and 20% of the total supply is circulating (flag: under 50% circulating). Incident history is moderate, with 1 historical incident on record and an incident-history measure of 75, supporting a decent but not top-tier security profile.

Social and behavioral risk score 69 out of 100 (BBB). Social audience data shows a Telegram following of 29,355 and a Twitter metric of "TW (linked)" with value 49, though influencer analytics snapshot data is not available. Agent risk signals are mixed: there are 0 allegations, 1 bad press item, 0 regulatory items, and 1 incident recorded. The overall score reflects active community presence, tempered by some negative coverage.

Inherent crypto risk for Tea Protocol: despite a moderate overall safety score (51.42/100), this asset carries typical smart-contract and ecosystem risks, especially given the developer health score of 0 and the network-side uncertainty from missing market cap data. The project has a defined hard cap and limited recorded incidents, but limited recent development and the under-50% circulating supply profile mean holders should remain cautious about long-term momentum and execution.