Syscoin

Track record score 71 out of 100. Syscoin has a solid track record with 12.3 years of operation. While it has faced one regulatory action, its history includes only one incident, suggesting a degree of stability. However, two additional concerns highlighted by research add some caution for potential investors.

Economic design score 75 out of 100. The economic design of Syscoin shows strengths with 100% of its total supply circulating. However, the absence of a hard supply cap raises concerns about potential inflation, which investors should consider when evaluating the long-term viability of the asset.

Developer health score 18 out of 100. Developer engagement appears low for Syscoin, as indicated by 0 commits in the last four weeks. Despite having a reasonable number of stars and forks on GitHub, the lack of recent activity may raise red flags for ongoing development and support of the project.

Network security score 50 out of 100. Syscoin has a mixed security profile. Despite being operational for 12.3 years and having recorded only one historical incident, its low market cap indicates vulnerabilities. This low economic security score suggests that the network may be susceptible to significant fluctuations or threats.

Social behavioral score 43 out of 100. Syscoin's social media presence is somewhat limited. While the sentiment around the project is overwhelmingly positive, with no negative sentiment recorded, the low audience engagement metrics and several concerns, including scam allegations and past regulatory issues, deserve attention.

Adoption liquidity score 28 out of 100. Syscoin demonstrates weak liquidity, with a daily trading volume of only $596,927, indicating limited market activity. Although it is listed on 23 exchanges, the low market cap raises concerns about the overall adoption and stability of the asset in the broader market.

Investing in Syscoin carries inherent risks typical of the crypto space, especially given its recent history of regulatory issues, low economic security, and weak developer engagement. Potential investors should be cautious and conduct thorough research before entering the market.