PRXVT by Virtuals

Liquidity and market dynamics score 38 out of 100. On-chain volume relative to market cap is very high (Vol/MCap 2.95%), but day-to-day liquidity appears thin, with 24h volume around $14,976 and a liquidity depth score of 4. Exchange listing data shows presence on 1 exchange, with 0 green, 1 yellow, and 0 red trust signals. A key risk factor here is the lack of any “green” exchange trust confirmation.

Team credibility score 42 out of 100. The asset is relatively new, at 0.4 years old. One audit firm is on record (audit score 60), and the whitepaper quality is rated high (100). However, the team is anonymous (team doxxed score 25), and development signals look limited, with 0 commits in the past 4 weeks (github activity score 8) and 18 stars. There are also flags for no recent commits, which can indicate slower ongoing work.

Social and behavioral score 60 out of 100. Social audience data shows activity across platforms (Twitter linked; Telegram 1,407). Risk monitoring shows 0 allegations and 0 regulatory issues, but it does note 1 bad press and 1 incident. There’s also no snapshot of influencer analytics available here, and no enrichment record for the risk-signal feed, which limits how fully the behavioral picture can be verified.

Contract mechanics score 99 out of 100. Security analysis of the contract is extremely strong: the contract is verified (100), there are no honeypot indicators (100), and the code is open source (100). Minting is disabled (100), mint authority is not present as a risk (100), and ownership/privilege checks pass (100). Balance manipulation is flagged as safe (100), and there are no hidden high-risk functions (100). Trading taxes are 0% buy and 0% sell, and a hard supply cap of 1,000,000,000 is defined (all 100). The only nuance is that circulating supply is 62% (circulating ratio score 60).

Inherent crypto risk (asset-specific): Even with strong contract-level safeguards, this token’s safety profile is moderated by lower liquidity and market-depth signals and by an anonymous team with limited recent development activity. That combination can increase practical risks like price volatility, thin exit liquidity, and less transparency into ongoing maintenance or changes.