Perle

Liquidity and market dynamics score 87 out of 100. Trading liquidity looks strong, with a volume-to-market-cap ratio of 19.52% and a 24h volume of $9,803,742. Exchange listing data is favorable, showing presence on 23 exchanges with no red flags (15 marked green and 8 marked yellow), which generally supports smoother trading and tighter spreads.

Team credibility score 78 out of 100. Team public identification is a positive signal, and there is 1 audit firm on record (with an audit quality score of 60). The whitepaper quality is rated medium (70). Asset age timing is not available, and some historical context such as deployment or genesis date is missing, which limits how confidently long-term development can be assessed.

Social and behavioral score 76 out of 100. Public audience data shows Twitter linked with follower counts unavailable, while Telegram shows 46,957 followers. Sentiment is balanced at 50% up and 50% down, suggesting mixed commentary rather than a strong one-sided trend. Agent risk signals are clean at 0 allegations, 0 bad press, 0 regulatory items, and 0 incidents, and this reduces behavioral and reputation-based safety concerns.

Contract mechanics score 5 out of 100. Contract security scanning is not available, contract verification data is not available, and ownership safety information is missing, including lack of block explorer data. Supply controls are limited in practice, with only a hard cap noted (1,000,000,000) and a very low circulating ratio of 18% of total supply, which matches the under50pctcirculating flag. With most core contract safety inputs unavailable, this bucket heavily weighs down the overall safety score.

Inherent crypto risk for Perle is elevated due to the smart contract safety information gap. Even with healthy liquidity and a reasonably credible team profile, the absence of verifiable contract and ownership details means key risk checks for how the token is governed and secured are not confirmable from the provided data.