Pangolin

Economic design score 65 out of 100.
Pangolin has a defined supply cap of 538 million tokens, with 43% currently in circulation. However, there is a flag indicating that less than 50% of the total supply is circulating, which could imply potential inflation or price instability concerns over time. Nevertheless, the established hard cap contributes positively to the project's economic framework.

Liquidity and market dynamics score 47 out of 100.
The liquidity score indicates challenges in trading volume, with a liquidity depth measure of only 16. The 24-hour trading volume stands at approximately $43,511, which may not be sufficient for traders seeking to enter or exit positions easily. Despite having presence on 11 exchanges, the liquidity situation could be a limiting factor for users.

Team credibility score 64 out of 100.
The project has existed for over 5 years, which provides some level of credibility. However, the team remains anonymous, which raises concerns about transparency and accountability. There is a high-quality whitepaper that supports the project's objectives, although the absence of audit data is a point of caution for potential investors.

Social behavior score 67 out of 100.
Pangolin has a verified social account on Telegram with an audience of 482 members. Additionally, the sentiment surrounding the project is overwhelmingly positive, with no negative remarks recorded. However, the absence of detailed social analytics limits insight into broader community engagement or influence.

Contract mechanics score 100 out of 100.
The contract associated with Pangolin demonstrates exemplary security measures. It is verified, open-source, free from honeypot risks, and has had its mint authority disabled. No hidden functions or trade taxes have been detected, which indicates robust safety and transparency in its operational mechanics.

Investing in Pangolin carries inherent risks common in the cryptocurrency market, such as volatility, regulatory uncertainties, and the potential for market manipulation. While the project showcases strong technical foundations and positive sentiment, the anonymous team and liquidity concerns may necessitate caution from potential investors.