OctaSpace

Track record score 75 out of 100. The project has been live for about 2.4 years, with clean public-record results: 0 regulatory action(s) and 0 historical incident(s) on record. However, research identified 4 additional concern(s) via agent red flags (agent red flags score 5), which partially offsets the otherwise solid history.

Developer health score 0 out of 100. Public development indicators show 0 GitHub stars, 0 forks, 0 commits in the last 4 weeks, and 0 PR contributors, along with the flag “norecentcommits.” This combination suggests very limited observable ongoing maintenance or improvement activity, which materially lowers safety confidence for long-term protocol reliability.

Network security score 51 out of 100. The chain is about 2.4 years old with 0 historical incidents on record, and it appears to have a defined supply cap (48,000,000) with 100% of total supply circulating. The main weakness is “low economic security,” reflected by an economic_security score of 0 and a relatively small market cap ($4,292,114), which can reduce the network’s ability to absorb shocks.

Social behavior score 77 out of 100. Audience and sentiment appear constructive: Telegram shows 7,615 users and Twitter is linked (TW 39), while sentiment is 100% up / 0% down. Agent risk signals are strong, with 0 allegations, 0 bad press, 0 regulatory signals, and 0 incidents flagged in the research snapshot, which supports a generally neutral-to-positive reputation profile.

Adoption and liquidity score 15 out of 100. Liquidity is constrained: market cap is $4,292,114 (market cap tier score 0) and “verylowl1_volume” is flagged. While 24h volume is reported at $161,113 and there are 6 CEX listings (with 2 green-trust), the overall liquidity and usage metrics remain weak, increasing the risk of larger price swings and harder exits.

Even with a moderate overall score (43.56/100), inherent crypto risks remain for OctaSpace, particularly around economic security and liquidity. Lower network economic security and very low observed L1 volume can amplify volatility and reduce resilience, while the lack of recent development signals raises uncertainty about ongoing improvements and operational continuity.