Nervos Network

Track record score 93 out of 100 (AAA): The project has a long operational history with 6.5 years live. Public records show 0 regulatory actions and 0 historical incidents on record, indicating clean compliance and relatively stable execution from a risk perspective.

Developer health score 59 out of 100 (B): Development activity looks active, with 100 commits in the last 4 weeks and 58 PR contributors. Community engineering output is moderate, with 1,140 GitHub stars and 226 forks, suggesting a solid but not top-tier developer and supporter base.

Network security score 63 out of 100 (BB): There have been 0 historical incidents on record and the chain is 6.5 years old. However, economic security is flagged as low with economic security score 19, and the network has no hard supply cap (supply cap defined score 50), which can imply potential inflation despite 98% of total supply circulating.

Social and behavioral score 76 out of 100 (BBB): Social risk indicators are strong, with 0 allegations, 0 bad press, 0 regulatory signals, and 0 incidents flagged in public agent checks. Audience data shows Telegram at 11,083 and Twitter/Reddit as linked, but with limited audience snapshot detail for some channels; sentiment is uniformly positive (100% up / 0% down).

Adoption and liquidity score 40 out of 100 (CC): Trading and liquidity appear mixed for the current market cap tier, with $4,879,322 daily volume and a market cap tier score of 0. While exchange listing data is robust (44 CEX listings, including 23 green-trust), lower day-to-day volume suggests adoption and liquidity depth may not be consistently strong.

Inherent crypto risk (Nervos Network): Even with a relatively clean history, this is still a protocol risk profile where market size and economic security factors matter. The absence of a hard supply cap and low economic-security score point to potential downside sensitivity if market conditions weaken or incentives fail to sustain demand.