MimboGameGroup

Liquidity and market dynamics score 41 out of 100. Trading activity relative to the token’s size is modest (volume/mcap 0.70%), and liquidity depth is limited (29 on the provided scale; 24h volume about $144,995). Exchange listing breadth is also mixed: it shows on 4 exchanges, with 1 green, 1 yellow, and 2 red signals, which can imply uneven accessibility or liquidity quality across venues.

Team credibility score 42 out of 100. The asset is relatively young (about 1.3 years old). Public audit data isn’t available in the provided records, and the team is classified as anonymous. The whitepaper is rated medium (70), which suggests some documentation exists but isn’t strong enough to offset limited verifiability. Overall, credibility signals are present but constrained by anonymity and lack of audit visibility.

Social and behavioral signals score 85 out of 100. Social audience data is available (Twitter linked; Telegram 123,610), and sentiment is strongly positive (100% up, 0% down). Agent risk signals show no reported allegations, bad press, regulatory issues, or incidents in the provided snapshot (0 across those categories). Even with limited social analytics feed context in the input, the behavioral risk indicators look clean.

Contract mechanics score 93 out of 100. The contract verification status is strong (100), and multiple safety checks are favorable: no honeypot behavior (100), open source (100), owner privileges appearing safe (100), balances locked (100), and trading tax set to 0% for buys and sells (100). The contract also reports a defined supply hard cap (100). The main concession is mintability (mint authority 50) alongside an under–50% circulating supply flag (17% circulating).

Inherent crypto risk for MimboGameGroup. Even with high contract safety signals, this token is still mintable and has only ~17% of total supply circulating, which can increase supply-driven and market-dynamics risk if minting occurs. Liquidity is also relatively thin compared with the token’s market size, so price impact and volatility may be higher than for more liquid assets.