Make TON Great Again

Liquidity and market dynamics score 54 out of 100. Trading activity versus market size looks relatively strong, with a volume-to-market-cap ratio of 19.20% (volume-to-mcap score 90). However, liquidity depth is more limited, with 24h volume around $407,994 and a liquidity depth score of 40. Exchange listing data shows presence on 2 exchanges, but none are categorized as “green trust” (0 green, 2 yellow, 0 red), which tempers the overall score.

Team credibility score 20 out of 100. Public records indicate the team is anonymous, which lowers confidence in accountability (team doxxed score 25). There is no deploy or genesis date available, and no audit data found in the provided inputs. The whitepaper quality is rated “none” (score 10), flagged as whitepaper_none, suggesting insufficient documentation for due diligence. Combined, these factors lead to a low credibility score.

Social and behavioral score 72 out of 100. Audience and activity signals are mixed but sentiment is fully positive in the snapshot provided (100% up / 0% down). Telegram shows 1,354 subscribers, while the Twitter follower count is unavailable but the account is linked (TW linked). Risk screening within the provided inputs shows no allegations, bad press, regulatory issues, or incidents (agent risk signals score 100), supporting a relatively constructive social-behavioral profile.

Contract mechanics score 5 out of 100. The provided inputs contain little to no contract safety information: no contract security scan, no contract verification data, no block explorer verification data, and no ownership data available. Supply mechanics are the only partial positive area: a hard cap is indicated (99,999,999) and the circulating ratio is shown as 100% of total supply (both scored 5). Overall, the lack of technical assurance drives this very low bucket score.

Inherent crypto risk (asset-specific): Even with a total score of 34.74/100, the biggest safety constraint for this token is technical transparency—there’s no available contract security/verification or ownership information in the inputs. For token holders, that increases uncertainty around upgradeability, control risks, and how reliably the stated token mechanics are enforced on-chain.