Integritee

Track record score 84 out of 100. The project has a relatively long live history (73, with 5.3 years active), with no regulatory actions and no historical incidents found in public records. However, security research flagged 3 additional concern items (agent red flags: 15), which prevents a perfect score and contributes to overall caution.

Developer health score 0 out of 100. Public code and activity signals are effectively absent in the most recent window: 0 GitHub stars, 0 forks, and 0 commits in the last 4 weeks, with 0 PR contributors. The flag “no recent commits” reinforces that there hasn’t been observable development momentum recently, which increases operational and delivery risk.

Network security score 53 out of 100. Chain age is solid (81, 5.3 years old) and incident history shows 0 historical incidents (100). The hard supply cap is defined (100) at 10,000,000, and 40% of total supply is circulating (circulating ratio score 30; under 50% circulating flagged). The biggest weakness is economic security scoring 0, with a very low market cap ($31,349) and “low economic security” flagged.

Social and behavioral score 61 out of 100. Social accounts appear to exist, with limited audience data shown (TW linked, 17; TG 25; RD linked). Sentiment is strong based on available signals (100% up / 0% down). Still, scam-related allegations were found (scamallegationsfound), and one allegation exists (agent risk signals: 85 with 1 allegation), even though no bad press, regulatory issues, or incidents are indicated.

Adoption and liquidity score 9 out of 100. Liquidity is thin: daily volume is effectively minimal for a tradable L1 metric (24h volume $5,716), and the market cap is very small ($31,349), driving a low market-cap tier score (0). Exchange listing data shows only 2 CEX listings (25, with 1 green-trust). The flag “verylowl1_volume” aligns with a limited ability to enter/exit positions without meaningful slippage.

Even with a long track record, Integritee’s overall safety picture is constrained by weak developer activity signals, low economic security scoring, and very low liquidity/volume. For this specific asset, inherent crypto risks remain: small-cap dynamics, limited market depth, and the possibility that technical progress or network incentives do not keep pace with market expectations.