HyperGPT

Liquidity and market dynamics score 63 out of 100 (BB). The asset shows strong volume relative to market cap, with a volume-to-mcap ratio of 90 and Vol/MCap at 17.13%. Short-term liquidity depth is moderate, with $373,522 in 24h volume. Exchange listing data shows presence on 6 exchanges, with 4 green, 1 yellow, and 1 red, indicating a mixed but established market footprint.

Team credibility score 50 out of 100 (CCC). Public records do not provide an asset age or deploy/genesis date, and there is no audit data available in the provided input. The team is anonymous, with a doxxing score of 25. On the positive side, the whitepaper quality is rated at 100, suggesting the project has presented documentation at a high standard.

Social and behavioral safety score 78 out of 100 (A). Social audience data shows Telegram at 26,815 and Twitter with linked status but limited follower detail. Behavioral and enforcement-related checks show strong results: 0 allegations, 0 bad press, 0 regulatory issues, and 0 incidents, producing a 100 risk-signal score in the provided assessment. The influencer analytics snapshot is not available, but the overall behavioral profile is favorable.

Contract mechanics score 100 out of 100 (AAA). The contract is verified (100) and shows no honeypot behavior (100). It is open source (100), with minting disabled (100), owner privileges safety checks passing (100), and no balance manipulation indicated, with balances locked (100). Additional controls are also scored positively, including hidden function checks (100), trading tax at 0.0% buy and 0.0% sell (100), a defined hard supply cap of 1,000,000,000 (100), and a high circulating ratio of 90% of total supply (100).

Inherent crypto risk for HyperGPT (smart contract token) still exists even with strong contract-level scores. Market risk remains due to liquidity depth not being maximal and the mixed exchange quality profile. Social and behavioral checks look clean in the provided data, but no holder distribution data is available, which can matter for concentration risk. An anonymous team flag also means reputational and governance transparency risks cannot be fully ruled out from public information.