Holoworld

Liquidity and market dynamics score 87 out of 100. Volume relative to market cap is strong (Vol/MCap 90; 22.15%), and short-term trading liquidity looks solid (liquidity depth 74; 24h volume about $9,353,991). Exchange listing data is robust, with 34 exchanges in total and a favorable mix (18 green, 13 yellow, 1 red), supporting better accessibility and typically tighter spreads.

Team credibility score 49 out of 100. The asset age is moderate (about 1.3 years), but there is no audit data in the provided security record. The team is anonymous (team doxxed 25; flag: anonymous_team), which lowers verifiability. The whitepaper is rated high (whitepaper quality 100), and that helps, but overall credibility remains mid-range given the missing audit information and anonymity.

Social and behavioral score 68 out of 100. Audience signals are limited in the snapshot (social audience 25; TW (linked) and TG (linked) with unavailable follower counts). For reputation and incident tracking, the risk profile is clean in the available notes: 0 allegations, 0 bad press, 0 regulatory items, and 0 incidents (agent risk signals 100). There’s also no enrichment record for additional context.

Contract mechanics score 93 out of 100. The contract is verified (100), and core abuse-pattern checks are strong: no honeypot (100), open source (100), and ownership/privilege safety passes (ownership safety 100). Balance manipulation controls are listed as locked (100). Trading taxes are zero (buy 0.0% / sell 0.0%), a hard supply cap is defined (2,048,000,000), and the circulating ratio is under half (31% circulating; flags: mintable, under50pctcirculating). The token is mintable (mint authority 50), so inflation risk depends on how minting is governed.

Inherent crypto risk (for this asset): Even with strong contract safety signals, Holoworld is flagged as mintable and has only about 31% of supply circulating, meaning token economics can still change if additional minting or supply releases occur. Liquidity appears healthy now, but risks remain typical for smart-contract tokens—market sentiment shifts, regulatory headlines not captured in the snapshot, and future contract/game-theory changes.