DIMO

Liquidity and market dynamics score 39 out of 100. On-chain volume relative to market cap is low (Vol/MCap = 0.20%), and liquidity depth is also limited based on the 24h volume ($11,358). Exchange listing data shows presence across 8 exchanges, with 3 marked green, 4 yellow, and 1 red—suggesting some accessibility, but not consistently strong market liquidity.

Team credibility score 73 out of 100. Public materials score highly, with the whitepaper rated 100 and the deployer address recorded at 70. One audit firm is on record (60). Some core identity inputs are not determined here—asset age (no deploy/genesis date), team doxxing (agent could not determine).

Social and behavioral signals score 59 out of 100. Social audience data is limited (TW and TG accounts are linked, with TW and TG follower counts reported as 25 for social audience). Security-related behavioral checks show 0 allegations, but there is 1 bad press, 0 regulatory flags, and 1 incident. Overall, this bucket reflects mixed sentiment/incident history rather than clear-cut risk.

Contract mechanics score 97 out of 100. The contract is verified (100), open source (100), with no honeypot indicators (100). Minting is disabled (100), mint/supply is capped (hard cap 1,000,000,000), and balance manipulation checks are rated safe with balances locked (100). Trading taxes are 0% buy and sell (100). The main nuance is that a proxy upgradability pattern is present (proxy_upgradable = 60), but other ownership and hidden-function safety checks score 100.

Holder distribution score 23 out of 100. Concentration is high: the top 10 wallets hold 87.4% of supply (top10concentration = 24) and the top 50 wallets hold 98.3% (top50concentration = 5). The largest non-filtered wallet holds 62.0% (largest_holder = 15), and overall holder count is 8,453, which suggests relatively few addresses control most of the circulating supply.

Inherent crypto risk for DIMO: despite strong contract-level controls (including mint disabled and no honeypot), this asset still carries market and distribution risk. Low liquidity signals and very high concentration among the largest holders can amplify price swings, while proxy upgradability (rated 60) means future contract changes remain a factor for long-term risk.