COGNI AI

Team credibility score 46 out of 100. Security analysis indicates the asset has 1 audit firm on record, and the whitepaper is rated medium (70). However, GitHub activity is limited, with 0 commits in the last 4 weeks and 189 stars (39). The team is anonymous (25), and the dataset does not include deploy or genesis timing, which reduces clarity on project longevity (asset age missing). Flags also cite no recent commits and an anonymous team.

Social and behavioral score 74 out of 100. Social account audience data shows Telegram at 7,812 and Twitter exists with audience data limited (TW linked) (social_audience 39). Agent-specific risk signals are clean, showing 0 allegations, 0 bad press, 0 regulatory issues, and 0 incidents (100), which supports a low observed-risk profile from public-facing records. Overall, this bucket looks stronger than others due to the absence of negative press or incident history in the available notes.

Contract mechanics score 5 out of 100. The core contract safety picture is weak because there is no contract security scan available and no verification data from public records. Ownership and verification details are also missing. Supply design is a key concern here: there is no hard supply cap defined (5) and a flag explicitly notes no supply cap, which can allow inflation risk over time. Without verification and security signals, technical risk remains elevated.

Inherent crypto risk for COGNI AI as a smart contract token remains meaningful. Even when social risk appears low, missing contract security and verification data, combined with an undefined hard supply cap, means investors may face higher uncertainty around technical safety and long-term token economics.