Cod3x

Economic design score 100 out of 100.
The project exhibits a well-defined economic structure with a total supply capped at 100,000,000 tokens and a circulating ratio of 100%, meaning all tokens are currently in circulation. This strong score reflects the clarity and robustness of its economic model, fostering confidence among stakeholders.

Liquidity and market dynamics score 16 out of 100.
The liquidity score indicates serious challenges, with trading volume negligible at $62 over 24 hours, marking it as near-zero volume. Additionally, this project lacks listings on reputable exchanges, which can hinder its ability to attract investors and facilitate trading.

Team credibility score 44 out of 100.
The team operating the project remains anonymous, which contributes to a lower credibility score. While the project has been active for 3.3 years, the absence of audit data raises concerns about transparency and trustworthiness within the community.

Social and behavioral score 40 out of 100.
The project’s social indicators show a limited audience, particularly on Twitter, where follower details are not available, even though the account is verified. The Telegram group has 717 members, and there are some risks noted, such as a history of hacks or exploits. However, there are no allegations or regulatory issues, reflecting a mixed social reputation.

Contract mechanics score 99 out of 100.
Almost all aspects of the project's contracts are solid, including verified contracts and no signs of honeypot schemes. While it uses an upgradable proxy pattern, there are strong safety features in place, like disabled mint authority and locked balances, ensuring robust mechanics that protect users.

Overall, while Cod3x exhibits some strong fundamentals through its economic design and contract mechanics, it faces significant challenges in liquidity and team transparency. Investors should exercise caution as crypto investments can be inherently volatile, and this project's current liquidity issues may pose additional risks.