Carbon Browser

Economic design score 100 out of 100.
The economic design of Carbon Browser is robust, receiving a perfect score. The token has a defined hard cap of 1,000,000,000, ensuring a restricted supply, while 100% of the total supply is circulating. This well-structured economic framework reflects positively on the project's long-term viability.

Liquidity and market dynamics score 49 out of 100.
Carbon Browser faces some challenges in liquidity, scoring 49. The trading volume is relatively low at $31,991 in the last 24 hours, contributing to minimal liquidity depth. While the volume to market cap ratio is healthy at 39.42%, the presence on three exchanges is somewhat limited, with only two being positively rated.

Team credibility score 56 out of 100.
The team credibility score for Carbon Browser stands at 56, reflecting a mixed assessment. The project is over two years old and has undergone one audit, but the anonymity of the team raises concerns. However, the high-quality whitepaper and a known deployer address help enhance credibility.

Social behavior score 79 out of 100.
Carbon Browser has a solid social behavior score of 79, indicating a generally positive reputation within the community. The project has an audience on Twitter, though specific follower counts are not available. With an 80% positive sentiment and no negative press or regulatory issues, the project's social standing appears strong.

Contract mechanics score 100 out of 100.
The contract mechanics of Carbon Browser are exemplary, with a perfect score. Key features include a verified contract, no honeypot risks, and open-source code. Moreover, the mint authority is disabled, owner privileges are safe, and there are no hidden functions, ensuring transparency and security for users.

Holder distribution score 18 out of 100.
The holder distribution score is notably low at 18, indicating significant concentration risks. The top 10 wallets control 84.3% of the supply, and the largest non-filtered holder owns 58.5%, which raises concerns about potential market manipulation. Additionally, there are very few total holders, with only 186 identified.

Inherent risks associated with Carbon Browser include the concentration of token holdings, which can lead to volatility and price manipulation. Additionally, the team's anonymity could pose challenges in accountability and trust over time. As with any crypto project, potential investors should conduct thorough research and consider these factors before participating.