Capybara Nation

Liquidity and market dynamics score 32 out of 100. Trading activity looks relatively thin versus its market value: volume-to-market-cap is 0.11%, and the reported liquidity depth corresponds to about $17,272 over 24 hours. Exchange listing data shows the token is present on 2 exchanges, with 1 green and 1 yellow classification and no red items, but overall liquidity remains limited.

Team credibility score 45 out of 100. The asset is about 2.4 years old, and there is 1 audit firm on record. However, the team is anonymous, and the whitepaper is rated low quality, which reduces transparency around implementation and intent despite the existence of some due-diligence artifacts.

Social and behavioral signals score 86 out of 100. Public sentiment is strongly positive (100% up, 0% down), with agent risk signals showing 0 allegations, 0 bad press, 0 regulatory concerns, and 0 incidents. Social audience data is available for Twitter (linked; follower count unavailable) and Telegram (172,789), and the overall behavioral profile appears clean based on the provided signals.

Contract mechanics score 100 out of 100. The contract is open source, honeypot checks show no honeypot behavior, and minting is disabled. Owner privileges and balance manipulation checks are rated safe, balances are locked, and there are no hidden or pausable/blacklist-style functions flagged. Trading tax is 0.0% for buys and sells, the supply hard cap is defined, and 100% of total supply is circulating.

Inherent crypto risk for this asset: even with strong contract checks, the main risk factor highlighted here is market/liquidity depth. Lower liquidity can increase price volatility and make it harder to exit positions during stress. Additionally, the team’s anonymity and low-rated whitepaper quality mean investors may have less off-chain clarity than for better-documented projects.