Babylon

Liquidity and market dynamics score 89 out of 100. Volume-to-market-cap is strong (90) with a Vol/MCap of 22.49%, and liquidity depth is supported by substantial 24h volume ($15,318,570) with a liquidity depth score of 80. Exchange listing data is robust as well, showing presence on 44 exchanges, with 29 marked green, 14 yellow, and 0 red.

Team credibility score 64 out of 100. There are six audit firm(s) on record with an audits score of 100, and the whitepaper quality is rated medium (70). However, the team is anonymous (team doxxed score 25) and there is no deploy or genesis date provided, which limits timeline-based verification.

Social and behavioral score 99 out of 100. Social audience metrics are strong, with Telegram at 167,283, reflected in a social-audience score of 97. Agent risk signals show no allegations, no bad press, no regulatory flags, and no incidents (100), supporting a very clean behavioral profile based on public records, though there is no social analytics feed snapshot available.

Contract mechanics score 5 out of 100. There is no contract security scan available, no verification data, and no block explorer data, leaving several core technical safety checks incomplete. Supply-related risk is indicated by “no hard supply cap” (supplycapdefined score 5) and “under 50% of supply circulating” (circulating_ratio score 5), with 36% of total supply circulating.

Inherent crypto risk for Babylon (smart-contract token): even with a favorable liquidity and social profile, the overall safety rating is held back by weak contract mechanics visibility and missing on-chain technical verification data. Tokens without a hard supply cap and with low circulating share can face additional supply-dynamics risk. As with all smart-contract assets, price and custody risks remain, especially when ownership and contract-level assurances cannot be independently confirmed.