Arkham

Liquidity and market dynamics score 91 out of 100. Trading liquidity appears strong, with a volume-to-market-cap ratio of 90 and volume-to-market-cap around 32.56%. Liquidity depth is rated 87, supported by strong 24h volume of about $29.05M. Exchange listing data is also very robust: the token is present on 73 exchanges, with 34 marked green, 32 yellow, and 2 red.

Team credibility score 76 out of 100. The project has meaningful history (asset age 3.4 years, scoring 70). Team identity appears solid, as the team is publicly identified (100). Audit activity exists but is limited—1 audit firm on record (audits score 60). The whitepaper quality is rated medium (70), which suggests documentation is present but not fully top-tier on this rubric.

Social and behavioral signals score 80 out of 100. Public sentiment is extremely clean, with 100% up and 0% down. Risk signals are also strong: there are 0 allegations, 0 bad press, 0 regulatory items, and 0 incidents (100). Social audience data shows Twitter is linked with unavailable follower counts, while Telegram has 20,748 followers (social audience score 46). Some influencer analytics snapshots are not available in the provided data.

Contract mechanics score 5 out of 100. This is the main weakness in the safety assessment. No contract security scan, contract verification, ownership data, or block explorer data are available in the inputs (reported as missing). Supply constraints are only partially reassuring: a hard cap is defined at 1,000,000,000 (supply cap defined score 5), and circulating supply is about 62% of total (circulating ratio score 5).

Inherent crypto risk (Arkham token). Even with strong liquidity, team identification, and positive social/risk headlines, smart-contract and on-chain technical transparency is limited in the provided dataset. For smart-contract tokens, that missing contract-level evidence increases uncertainty around how the code behaves and how token rules are enforced, which can matter during adverse market conditions.