ARC

Economic design score 100 out of 100.
The project's economic design is excellent, showcasing a clearly defined supply cap of 1,030,000,000 tokens with 100% of the total supply already circulating. This level of transparency in the tokenomics indicates strong fundamentals, which can enhance investor confidence and stability in the asset.

Liquidity and market dynamics score 44 out of 100.
The liquidity score reflects some challenges, with a volume-to-market cap ratio of 1.30%, suggesting limited trading volume relative to the asset’s market cap. While the project is listed on two exchanges with one being well-regarded, the overall liquidity depth is low, with a 24-hour trading volume of approximately $21,366. This may impact the ease at which investors can enter or exit positions.

Team credibility score 34 out of 100.
The team credibility score is concerning, as the project is led by an anonymous team with no verified deploy or genesis date. There is also a lack of audit data, which raises potential red flags regarding security and trust. While the deployer address is recorded, anonymity can deter some investors due to associated risks.

Social behavior and signals score 57 out of 100.
The project's social engagement is moderate, highlighted by a telegram audience of 5,576 and a linked Twitter account. However, audience data is limited on social platforms, and there are two additional concerns noted. Despite this, the absence of negative press or regulatory incidents bodes well for the project's reputation.

Contract mechanics score 99 out of 100.
In terms of technical security, the contract mechanics are exceptionally strong with a verified contract, open-source code, and no honeypot detected. The mint authority is disabled, owner privileges are checked, and balances are locked, which enhances trustworthiness. However, the use of a proxy pattern indicates potential for updates, necessitating a well-resourced governance model.

Holder distribution score 58 out of 100.
The holder distribution presents some risk, with the top 10 wallets holding 62.8%, which could create volatility if those wallets decide to sell. Additionally, the largest holder accounts for 18.8% of the total supply. While a healthy holder count of 10,507 exists, the concentration within a few wallets warrants caution.

Inherent crypto risk remains significant given the anonymity of the team, potential liquidity challenges, and the concentration of token holdings. Investors should consider these factors carefully, as they can contribute to price volatility and regulatory scrutiny in a constantly evolving market.