AltLayer

Track record 91 out of 100. The project shows strong cleanliness in public records, with 0 regulatory actions and 0 historical incidents on record. Security-related research flagged 2 additional concern(s) (agent red flags score 30), which reduces the overall score from a perfect mark, but the absence of recorded incidents and regulatory issues keeps the track record in a high-quality range.

Developer health 0 out of 100. Public development signals appear absent or unavailable in the measured window: 0 GitHub stars, 0 forks, 0 commits in the last 4 weeks, and 0 PR contributors. The bucket is explicitly flagged for no recent commits, which is consistent with the extremely low score and suggests limited observable maintenance activity over the near term.

Network security 54 out of 100. On-chain and protocol fundamentals look mixed: economic security is low (15) relative to the asset’s market cap of $50,869,623. Positively, 0 historical incidents are recorded, a hard cap of 10,000,000,000 is defined, and 62% of total supply is circulating (circulating ratio score 60). The overall score reflects the low economic security despite otherwise solid supply structure.

Social and behavioral 68 out of 100. Social audience signals are present but not strong: 25 indicates limited measurable audience reach from linked Twitter and Telegram accounts. Research did not identify any allegations, bad press, regulatory issues, or incidents (agent risk signals score 100). There is no snapshot for influencer analytics (“No social analytics feed snapshot”), but the available behavioral risk checks score cleanly.

Adoption and liquidity 43 out of 100. Trading activity is moderate: 24h volume is $5,287,922 with a volume score of 18. Exchange listing depth appears relatively strong with 61 CEX listings (exchange listing score 100, including 28 green-trust), but the bucket also penalizes liquidity/market-size context—market cap tier score 0—leading to a mid-to-low adoption/liquidity rating.

Inherent crypto risk (AltLayer, L1 protocol). Even with a relatively clean public record, this asset’s safety profile is constrained by very weak developer health signals (0/100) and low economic security (15). For holders, that combination can matter if network incentives, maintenance, or economic resilience do not keep pace with demand—while overall liquidity and market presence are only moderate.