Alkimi [OLD]

Economic design score 100 out of 100.
The economic design of Alkimi is rated exceptionally high, indicating a well-structured tokenomics model. With a defined supply cap of 250 million, this clear limit is a positive aspect for potential investors, suggesting a thoughtful approach to inflation and value preservation.

Liquidity and market dynamics score 6 out of 100.
The score indicates significant concerns regarding liquidity for Alkimi. The project experiences very low daily trading volume of only $4, which can impede market activity. Additionally, it is listed on one exchange without any green trust ratings, signaling a lack of adequate trading options for investors.

Team credibility score 55 out of 100.
Alkimi's team credibility score reflects a mix of points. While the project has a well-rated whitepaper and a known deployer address, the team's anonymity and limited audit history raise some concerns about trust and accountability within the project.

Social and behavioral score 72 out of 100.
Alkimi showcases a moderate social presence, with notable engagement on Telegram and a verified Twitter account. Although there are limited audience metrics available, the absence of negative signals like bad press or regulatory issues indicates a generally positive image within the community.

Contract mechanics score 87 out of 100.
The contract mechanics for Alkimi are robust, as the project's smart contracts are fully verified and open source. There are safeguards in place, including disabled minting capabilities and checks on ownership privileges. However, the ability for the owner to change balances and the presence of hidden functions warrant caution.

Holder distribution score 22 out of 100.
This score indicates a concerning concentration of token holdings. A staggering 90.1% of the supply is held by the top ten wallets, with the largest wallet controlling 70.5%. Such distribution can lead to extreme volatility and poses risks if major holders decide to sell their assets.

Alkimi, like many cryptocurrencies, operates within a highly speculative environment where price fluctuations can be significant. Factors such as limited liquidity, a high concentration of token holdings, and an anonymous team introduce additional risks that potential investors should carefully consider. Overall, while the project has some commendable elements, caution is advised due to these inherent risks.