Aethir

Liquidity and market dynamics score 94 out of 100. Trading liquidity looks strong with a volume to market cap ratio of 41.02% and liquidity depth supported by about $53,777,885 in 24h volume. Exchange listing data is broad, with 67 exchanges total (32 green, 30 yellow, 1 red), which typically improves access and reduces execution friction.

Team credibility score 54 out of 100. The project is about 2.4 years old (asset age score 58), and the whitepaper quality is rated highly (100). However, the team is anonymous (team doxxed 25) and there is no audit data available in public records. The deployer address is recorded (deployer known 70), which adds traceability, but the lack of doxxed leadership and audit coverage pulls the score down.

Social and behavioral risk score 70 out of 100. Public social audience data shows Telegram at 87,612 and Twitter with linked status but limited analytics (social audience score 57). Sentiment is balanced with 50% up and 50% down. Security-style behavioral checks show 0 allegations, 1 bad press item, 0 regulatory flags, and 1 incident (agent risk signals 85), which suggests some noise but not a dominant red-flag pattern.

Contract mechanics score 79 out of 100. At least one contract is verified, the contract is open source, and honeypot checks show no honeypot (all 100). Trading tax is 0% on buys and sells, and a hard supply cap is defined at 42,000,000,000 (both 100). That said, the token is mintable (mint authority 50) and ownership can change balances (balance manipulation 20), while hidden pausable and blacklist functions exist (hidden functions 100).

Holder distribution score 34 out of 100. Concentration is elevated with top 10 wallets holding 83.0% of supply (top10 concentration 31) and top 50 wallets holding 95.3% (top50 concentration 14). The largest non-filtered wallet holds 33.3% (largest holder 27). Holder count is sizable at 53,257, but the distribution risk remains because a small number of wallets dominate balances.

Inherent crypto risk for Aethir: Even with strong liquidity and generally clean trading mechanics, inherent smart contract and token-holder risks remain. For this asset specifically, mintability, owner ability to change balances, hidden pausable or blacklist-related functionality, and relatively concentrated holdings can increase the chance of adverse outcomes during governance, upgrades, or operational incidents, despite the absence of honeypot behavior.