AceD Project Profile

There are a number of factors which contribute to the overall calculation for a development score. We analyze the GitHub repository and assess factors such as activity, commit, vulnerabilities and developer community feedback (forks, stars etc).

There are a number of positive factors which may indicate this project actively in development these include; daily repo updates.

But there are also a number of negative factors which lower the score; no stars, no watchers, no forks, no mentionable users, no repo stars.

The sentiment score indicates how well the wider community regards the project. We analyse social media platforms such a Reddit, Twitter etc to access if the community is talking positively or negatively about a project.

There is a negative factor - The overall sentiment is very poor - to indicate this project is not well-regarded positively in the community.

More times than often community is the back bone and driving force of any project. An engaged community can steer a project to the moon and conversely a disengaged community can drive into a brick wall.

There are a number of positive factors which may indicate this project has an active and engaged community these include; extremely high hashtag tweets.

But there are also a number of negative factors which lower the score; no reddit articles, poor gitHub account watchers, no search result count.

The awareness score indicates how well known the project is outside the cryptocurrency community. For a project to moon, we would expect to see it mentioned in the main stream media, non-cyrpto websites and publications. We analyse the web to judge how well know a project is and therefore how much exposure it gets in the mainstream.

There are a number of negative factors which might tell us this project is not well known outside the crypto community these include; no search result total, no overall news articles, no primary saved news articles, no all saved news articles.

Using a number of factors such as age and reputation we give each project a credibility rating. The higher the credibility the more confident we are that our scoring is as accurate as possible. The older a project is the more data we have to analyse and the more confidence we have in our scoring. The flip side of this the newest projects carry the most risk.

Neutral points - good project age (released Jul 30, 2018).

Ultimately money talks - does this project have high liquidity or is no one buying it all? Even if all the other factors look good - you can only make money if someone will buy it off you.

There is a negative factor - very poor USD 24hr volume - to indicate this project does not have good liquidity.