0x Protocol

Liquidity and market dynamics score 88 out of 100. Trading liquidity looks strong based on high volume-to-market-cap efficiency (Vol/MCap 11.85%) and healthy depth (24h volume about $12,097,801). Exchange listing data is robust as well, with presence across 78 exchanges, including 32 marked green, 37 yellow, and 5 red—suggesting broad market access with only a limited portion showing weaker conditions.

Team credibility score 79 out of 100. The project benefits from substantial longevity (asset age 8.7 years) and public team identification (team doxxed 100). Security attestations are present but not extensive, with 1 audit firm on record (audits 60). Technical signals from public development activity are moderately positive (GitHub activity 65 with 1,410 stars) and the whitepaper quality is rated medium (70). A “no recent commits” flag is noted.

Social and behavioral score 68 out of 100. Social audience metrics show limited visibility for some channels, but Telegram has measurable reach (TG 1,125), while Twitter and Reddit are marked as linked with unavailable follower counts (TW linked; RD linked). Agent risk signals are clean: 0 allegations, 0 bad press, 0 regulatory issues, and 0 incidents. There is also no enrichment record available for social behavior beyond the snapshot.

Contract mechanics score 5 out of 100. Critical technical safety inputs are largely missing or unavailable: no contract security scan, no contract verification data from public records, and no ownership data. The only quantified positive detail is supply structure: a hard cap is defined (1,000,000,000) and the circulating ratio is relatively high (85% circulating), both scored at 5. This leaves substantial uncertainty around the contract’s specific safety properties.

Inherent crypto risk (asset-specific). Even with strong liquidity and reasonable team credibility, this asset’s safety assessment is constrained by the very low contract-mechanics score, driven by absent or unavailable verification and security-scan information. For smart-contract tokens, that means investors must still account for counterparty and smart-contract risks—such as vulnerabilities or incorrect assumptions about ownership and verification—despite favorable market and social signals.